use of force

Date	Division	Location	Name	OIS Number
June 19,2017	Van Nuys Division	4200 Matilija Ave	Unk	NRF00-17
June 15,2017	Newton Division	400 block of 49th St	Jose Rauda	NRF046-17
June 8,2017	Hollenbeck Division	4400 Turquoise Street	Pedro Echeverria	NRF043-17
June 6, 2017	Harbor Division	1100 Wilmington Boulevard	Rivera, Eric	NRF042-17
May 25, 2017	Southwest Division	3100 Block of South Normandie	Bernedino Perlera	NRF036-17
May 16, 2017	77th Division	3300 W. 63rd St.	Henry, Gilbert	NRF034-17
May 13, 2017	77th Division	Denker Ave S/O 62nd Street	Harden, Gary	NRF032-17
May 8, 2017	Foothill Division	11300 Alethea Dr, Sunland	Soderberg, Anthony	NRF029-17
April 22, 2017	Mission	Rayen Street E/O Sepulveda Boulevard	Cruz, David	NRF027-17
April 7, 2017	Central	6th & San Pedro	Perkins, Bernard	NRF025-17
March 24, 2017	Hollenbeck	Breed St & 1st St.	Barragan, Fred	NRF021-17
March 7, 2017	SOE/ Gardena	Main/102nd Street	Castro, Jose	NRF018-17
March 6, 2017	Rampart	1300 block of Edgecliffe Drive	Cooke, Shellie	NRF016-17
March 4, 2017	Central	Broadway/Olympic Ave	Valencia, Alejandro	NRF015-17
February 21, 2017	Outside Anaheim	Outside City	Juvenile	NRF014-17cr
February 7, 2017	77th Division	845 South Figueroa	Frances, Tyree	NRF012-17ma
January 31, 2017	Hollywood	6400 block of Sunset Boulevard	Solomon Picart	NRF011-17
January 30, 2017	Outside Downey	7800 block of Borson Street	Susp1/Susp2	NRF010-17an
January 17, 2017	Outside Anaheim	2700 block of West Broadway	Ramirez, Oscar Infante	NRF005-17cr
January 15, 2017	Olympic	1800 block of South Kingsley Drive	Pioquinto, Raul	NRF004-17ma
January 10, 2017	CTD	Hope Street south of 11th Street	Rogers, Michael	NRF003-17an
January 9, 2017	Metro/ Wval	Reseda Boulevard & Vanowen Street in Reseda	Flores, Marco Tulio	NRF002-17ma

Objectively Reasonable: The legal standard used to determine the lawfulness and appropriateness of a use of force is the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. See Graham versus Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989). Graham states in part, The reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight. The calculus of reasonableness must embody allowance for the fact that police officers are often forced to make split-second judgments - in circumstances that are tense, uncertain and rapidly evolving - about the amount of force that is necessary in a particular situation. The test of reasonableness is not capable of precise definition or mechanical application. The force must be reasonable under the circumstances known to the officer at the time the force was used. Therefore, the Department examines all uses of force from an objective standard, rather than a subjective standard. (2009 LAPD Manual 1/556.10)